Are you planning to one day "awaken"?
Spiritual fundamentalism is a powerful driving force that takes “spiritual awakening” very seriously. It's a finite game that seeks rewards for hard work and sacrifice. Ironically, the game that promises the reward of ego-transcendence, often results in the most rigid ego-fixation.
Do you believe there is a way to “awaken”? Do you become agitated with your ‘self’ when you fail to stay focused on your plan of awakening? Do you often change that plan when new information becomes available?
Make no mistake, within the ego’s self-concept is the goal of “awakening” to truth. It’s easy to recognize the ego’s plan for “awakening” by four simple words: “If this, then that.”
If you do this long enough and struggle hard enough, then that will cause you to “awaken.” Think only this, do only that, be only this, say only that....and you too will awaken to truth.
Yet, what the ego stubbornly refuses to see is that truth is infinite. There is NO point at which one will have it, in contrast to NOT having it. Truth does NOT contrast or compare, but egos do quite often. Therefore, all your plans of acquisition, or 'getting,' truth are useless. However, you will get "spiritual" (for whatever good that does)
The ego-self is a sacrificial concept that is real, but NOT true. Indeed, even the ego realizes this, because it’s life is nothing but a struggle to be TRUE. Infinite truth requires no struggle or sacrifice.
However, the ego will have none of that. It’s plans must always involve sacrifice and this is why it believes truth can be found, but only through hard work and sacrifice.
The one thing the ego will never accept is that it cannot have truth, like it has stuff. There is nothing you need do to have truth. There is nothing you could think that would help you ‘know’ truth and there is certainly no one you need listen to in order to learn truth.
You cannot plan for truth.
So now what?
Ha!
Artwork by Scot Olsen - "untitled"
Oh, this is a good one. Yes, yes, and yes.
ReplyDeleteWell, Mike, I guess I have to stop writing to you, if you know what I mean;-) If I can't work toward peaceful and awakening, how WILL in know truth when I finally have moved close enough to see it and be it, since I seem to be confused into doing before truth is evident?
ReplyDeleteSo "now what?" sounds like doing nothing, which I presume has to be literal?
I do not know if it is a blessing or no, but I'm not one much for seeking "awakening". Now, I do hold that one is enlightened nearly everyday, from the sublime to the ridiculous...always. I think those who need to name their "spirituality" just desperately need finiteness. They need definition. I've met two people in my time who have actually said, "God and I have a relationship a little more special than most people." And they believe that. All you can think is, "wow, what an ego."
ReplyDeleteThis I do know though, Mike. Amidst all the craziness of this world, I believe I heard the return of a red winged blackbird off in some distant flood pool.
Now what? Walk on into Spring, I guess.
Perhaps I ought to post that last part into a blog on the new planet Gaia, since I can't think of one darn thing to say.
Blessings,
Nahnni
Well, Mike, I guess I have to stop writing to you, if you know what I mean;-) If I can't work toward peaceful and awakening, how WILL in know truth when I finally have moved close enough to see it and be it, since I seem to be confused into doing before truth is evident?
ReplyDeleteI sense that it's not really a "knowing" in terms of how we "know" things. Therefore, it can't be described as something one "knows."
I suppose it's best to just engage deeply and not be so deeply concerned about the purpose of that engagement. That's what's meant by "So now what?"
Thanks!
Nahnni,
ReplyDelete"Now, I do hold that one is enlightened nearly everyday, from the sublime to the ridiculous...always. I think those who need to name their "spirituality" just desperately need finiteness. They need definition."
Indeed. Naming it may impede the living it.
mikeS
"ouch!"
ReplyDeleteOh, c'mon...that didn't hurt!
mikeS
No One,
ReplyDeleteThanks, thanks and thanks!
mikeS