The first rule of an infinite player is that rules are never ‘serious’ and rules not taken seriously are open to change. Infinite players need not take rules seriously simply because they only desire to continue playing, because they realize that the games never end.
An ego-self demands rules, because rules maintain structure and an ego-self is nothing but a highly structured system of beliefs (rules). Lack of seriousness puts the rules in jeopardy and rules that lose credibility detract from finite players who have won rewards (recognition) seriously playing by the rules.
Imagine what would happen of you chose to no longer take your ‘self’ seriously? Who would you be?
Finite players do not recognize infinite players, but infinite players never fail to recognize other infinite players, because “you will know them by their fruits.”
The ego is serious business and NOT to acknowledge an ego’s 'seriousness' is a serious insult to an ego. In fact, the ultimate in ego seriousness is called the “sacred.” Merely to question the “sacred” is deemed an attack and will be met with swift justice.
Egos (the “I” you take serious) are by nature finite, since all individual egos believe in death and death is a finite game. But finite egos can play infinitely.
Some readers of this blog feel duped (I should post the irate emails, LOL!). They read the title Peaceful Self: Spiritual Perspectives Along the Path to Enlightenment and think “Wow! This must be a serious spiritual blog.” But, alas, after reading the posts, they become convinced I’m a fraud, but not because I don’t write about “Spiritual Perspectives Along the Path to Enlightenment,” but because I fail to take those perspectives seriously.
Spirituality is a game like any other game we play in 'life,' but this does not stop egos from taking it all very seriously. Yet, the only reason they take it seriously is that an outcome or reward is expected. Without the carrot, the horse won’t pull the cart to market. Expectation demands serious adherence to the rules in order to acquire the reward. Even the non-duality games require a carrot, since who’d seek an experience of non-duality if there were no reward from that experience?
The ego-self is serious business, hence, what it believes must be taken seriously, otherwise, why believe anything at all. If ego beliefs (rules of play) were not taken seriously, this would place the ego itself into question as not worthy of serious belief and if the ego no longer took itself serious what would that mean for “you.” Ha!
There are many ways a finite ego-self can play infinitely. However, like a finite player, infinite players also have rules and the chief rule is that all rules can and must be changed (especially when it appears someone might win).Even though infinite players can, and do, win games, they fail to take winning seriously and this entirely negates the point of winning (and tends to piss off the serious players who live by the rules).
Infinite players are unconcerned with a game’s beginning or end, nor are they concerned with conforming to a games boundaries or limits. Infinite players seek to make rules or boundaries more fluid, by questioning the very reason for the rule in the first place (What do you mean“the Bible says it’s so”?).
Of course, infinite players follow rules, but not seriously and this lack of seriousness allows infinite players to play with rules and NOT by rules. Even the rules of death are perceived as fluid and yielding to change. Infinite players are not anarchists and follow rules when rules are agreed upon and not because those who make the rules demand agreement.
Infinite players can play the roles required of finite games, but are not constrained by roles and do not take them seriously. Doctors, lawyers, gurus and Indian chiefs all have scripts to follow. However, although infinite players are aware of scripts, they have no fear of the impromptu and spontaneous (which often changes the rules delineated in the script).
Infinite players do not seek outcomes, but "surprise" (or that which eliminates outcomes). Infinite players realize that to be open to surprise one must be vulnerable and to be vulnerable one cannot follow a script.
Infinite players do not seek transcendence, which asserts an outcome, but seek transformation, which has no end.
While finite players play seriously, infinite players play joyously and laugh often. Even a game as serious as death is cause for laughter. Finite players laugh at those who fail to follow the rules. However, because they do not take rules seriously, infinite players have no reason to laugh at others, but only with others. Their laughter is not a result of winning, but more a response to discovering a surprising new way to keep the game in play and bring on more players.
Infinite players do not ignore the past. Yet, neither do they need to play by rules determined in the past. Rather, infinite players play at “reinterpreting” the past so that conclusions arrived at in the past need not be repeated in the future and the future remains open as an unending “horizon” of possibility (often referred to as "freedom").
Infinite players do not seek to forcefully block the actions of other players, but engage in actions that facilitate authentic actions from other players. This keeps boundaries “fluid” and limits always in flux.
Infinite players are unconcerned with applying power externally, but are more concerned with coming from an interior place of strength. Strength facilitates possibility, while power closes down all possibility.
Infinite players avoid ownership of ideas and seek to use ideas to engage the Deep Spirit of others in order to reveal their own Deep Spirit center. It is from the “center” in each of us, that the center of ALL is realized.
Finite egos can play life’s games infinitely by following these simple rules. However, keep in mind that the first rule of playing infinitely is that rules must not be taken seriously so that they can be changed...
...and change often.
(many of the concepts presented here were distilled from James Carse's "Finite and Infinite Games." However, considering that he supports playing infinitely, I'm sure he won't mind)
Artwork by Pauline Jones - "The Long Dream"
Ah, so that's what you were on about!
ReplyDeleteLovely set of concepts. Makes a lot of sense.
Not taking it all seriously is easy when there isn't anyone who needs validation from the outcome of the game.
Love to you Mike - Suzanne
Did you ever have an infinite dream, no plot, just kind of stepping along and then every so often it seems there is a spider. Then you start seeing the spider everywhere you go, and suddenly, the dream becomes finite because that spider has kind of eclipsed the dream. Maybe that spider brings some friends, and they all sort of develop a coup in your dream...then you wake up from the dream with a bit of a sigh and think to yourself, wow, what was THAT all about?
ReplyDeleteThe moral of the dream seems to be that no matter where you sit, a spider might just drop into your porridge. So, whether one is an infinite player or a finite player, that spider is pesky. Maybe it is a rule spider...or an ego spider, but its some kind of spider.
That's when you have to take a moment to consider what it is you are taking seriously, because the spiders are starting to get to you and that poses a whole new question.
It's enlivening to bring on more players, unless they bring their own rulebook and insist you now play by the new rules. And that's the changing dynamic...who will come with the book of plays and who will come unobstructed by the acts and scenes. I'm still trying to decide if transformation really does come from unsettling change...to change, therefore, into something transforming.
Good post, Mike. Something to think about, especially when one is contemplating if one has rules one is not even aware of. I really did dream of a spider turning into spiders and I wonder what they mirror? Perhaps they indicate the test of strength and perseverence...perhaps they mean just walk on by because at some point, you are just going to run into another one.
Blessings,
Nahnni
"Not taking it all seriously is easy when there isn't anyone who needs validation from the outcome of the game."
ReplyDeleteBut... "there isn't anyone who needs validation from the outcome of the game." Right?
Isn't that what you teach?
mikeS
Nahnni,
ReplyDelete"So, whether one is an infinite player or a finite player, that spider is pesky. Maybe it is a rule spider...or an ego spider, but its some kind of spider."
Indeed. Yet, an infinite player merely accepts spiders as part of the game. Have you ever played with spiders?
"It's enlivening to bring on more players, unless they bring their own rulebook and insist you now play by the new rules. And that's the changing dynamic...who will come with the book of plays and who will come unobstructed by the acts and scenes."
True, we all have our dramas to play out, but recognizing we choose to play puts a new twist on the nature of the games. Many believe that they must play and play by the rules. There will always be those who insist we play by certain rules. In not taking the rules seriously, infinite players are not trapped by the rules and those not trapped by the rules have an easier time changing the rules.
In my humble opinion...
mikeS
The illusion of the ego can be taken extraordinarily seriously...by no one!
ReplyDeleteBTW it occurs to me, reading some of the commentary exchanges, that we are a bit stuck in concepts (necessarily so) but are employing the dialectical method to reveal the concepts closest to the truth. Or what we seem to think is the truth!
ReplyDeleteI think we're doing well.
No One,
ReplyDeleteYes... in Hegelian terms (thesis, antithesis and synthesis)we tend to seek for a synthesis. However, if the game is infinite, synthesis is only another thesis or antithesis.
Only some think they have found the ultimate synthesis or a "theory of everything."
(those folks don't like me too much...)
Nevertheless, I agree we are "doing well" and will probably do well even when we aren't!
Thanks!
mikeS
Yes...truth is relative, and all that...
ReplyDeleteLovely to spar with you, as intimately as one can get in this electronic forum.
Love, Suzanne
"an infinite player merely accepts spiders as part of the game."
ReplyDeleteSane and rational, indeed. I have to work on the "merely"...because I seem to have a limit. I wonder if a rule is the same as a limit, or if B as in B and S as in S is an entirely separate thing from the rule factor.
"Have you ever played with spiders?"
I'd have to admit to setting up the chess board twice or thrice, but also confess to just letting the game pass. The reasons for the pass are multi-faceted; however, I am beginning to see the value in plucking the strings of the web, if only to discover those rules in myself that I may not be aware of in suspecting the rules of the other. Just to see where it might go might be a thing of discovery. But then there is the limit factor.
"There will always be those who insist we play by certain rules. In not taking the rules seriously, infinite players are not trapped by the rules and those not trapped by the rules have an easier time changing the rules."
I like that. Again, the road to discovering one's own rules as aforementioned is an adventure in itself.
Appreciations always, Mike, and that's the truth, plain and simple.
Blessings,
Nahnni
"Lovely to spar with you,"
ReplyDelete"Spar"???
Well now... that's an interesting take on our discussions...
Hmmmm....
mikeS
I have to work on the "merely"...because I seem to have a limit."
ReplyDeleteHa! Indeed...it may not be so 'merely' as I make it seem. I too struggle with limits.
"I am beginning to see the value in plucking the strings of the web, if only to discover those rules in myself that I may not be aware of in suspecting the rules of the other. Just to see where it might go might be a thing of discovery. But then there is the limit factor."
Yes, this can lead to surprising results and aid in pressing the limits out a bit farther each time.
"Again, the road to discovering one's own rules as aforementioned is an adventure in itself."
True, and I feel the adventure is in the engagement and gradually, at ones own pace, we see the rules for what they are and become surprisingly free of them in that 'seeing.'
Thanks!
mikeS
Ah, a player after my own evergreen Heart! :-) Rules are for games, computers, corporations, and other dead things. Life has no rules.
ReplyDelete"Hell, there are no rules around here; we're trying to accomplish something!" Thomas Edison.
Everything I comment, you nitpick it...sparring.
ReplyDeleteHey Mr. Unicorn!
ReplyDeleteThanks for stoppin' by.
Yes...we play with rules here.
mikeS
No One,
ReplyDeleteNo I don't! You're wrong!
(teehee)
mikeS
Hi Mike
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if this falls in or out of seriousness or in or out of a game, part of some sort of rule I follow, but as I read, I suddenly heard in my head an excerpt from a quote by Mother Theresa.
Life is a game, play it.
The only rules I know absolutely influence me, without exception, are confusion, uncertainty, flux. But are those game rules, elements or only illusion?
Maybe I'm happiest wallowing in these words and just don't know it...
Barbara
Hey Barbara,
ReplyDelete"Life is a game, play it."
Indeed. Don't run from it, avoid it, escape it, seek to transcend it, etc, etc, etc.
Simply engage it...and play..
Thanks!
mikeS
Mike, you funny.
ReplyDelete