Sunday, October 18, 2009

Does Adyashanti Cherish Illusions?





Adyashanti is currently one of the most revered of the internet's neo-advaitist’s messengers. I enjoy reading and listening to his philosophical discussions. However, over time I’ve come to recognize that he is as deluded as any other postmodern Non-Dual/Zen "teacher" and this delusional mindset is contagious, since the message is passed from one idolized messenger to another.

The quotes used here can be found at Adyashanti.org, “The Quest”

“The quest for enlightenment is the quest for truth or reality. It’s not a quest for ideas about truth—that’s philosophy. And it’s not a quest to realize your fantasies about truth—that’s fundamentalized religion. It’s a quest for truth on truth’s terms. It’s a quest for the underlying principle of life, the unifying element of existence.”
The “quest for the underlying principle of life, the unifying element of existence” is not found in solitary excursions through the mind, since this only results in egoic conceptual “fantasies." It is encountered in the depth of relationship and that is "the underlying principle of life, the unifying element of existence" and the reason you're 'here.'

Truth is not available to separate individuals outside relationship, since this makes it 'proprietary truth,' which must belong to an 'individual' (just not you). The truth, simultaneously experienced by two or more who have encountered it together, is not relative to any individual ego-self. However, truth encountered together can be negated as truth, especially for those who believe 'truth' belongs only to the individuals we have designated as specialized "Wisdom Masters."

“In your quiet moments of honesty, you know that you are not who you present yourself as, or who you pretend to be. Although you have changed identities many times, and changed them even in the course of a single day, none of them fit for long. They are all in a process of constant decay. One moment you’re a loving person, the next an angry one. One day you’re an indulgent, worldly person; the next a pure, spiritual lover of God. One moment you love your image of yourself, and the next you loathe it. On it goes, identified with one self-image after another, each as separate and false as the last.”
Yes, however, this 'wise man' (with the Hindu name) fails to address the fact that all of these “identities” are manufactured in relation to engagement with the identity of others. The ‘self’ was not constructed in isolation, but immersed in relationship with a 'world' of other identities. Even the illusion is communal and was constructed in collaborative engagement. Unfortunately, this may make it “real,” just not true and it is truth that we must seek together.

Therefore, if the “real” was constructed in cooperative engagement, the truth will be discovered in the same way and this lends credence to the fact that we are powerful beyond belief (since it is belief which limits us). The illusion is that by seeking the truth as an individual, more illusion is what you will find. An individual must always discover illusion, because an “individual” is a concept that 'we' made "real." If your "quiet moments" were truly "honest," then a desire to engage the 'others' of your world will be the result, in the realization that this is the only way to encounter truth.

“When this game of delusion gets boring or painful enough, something within you begins to stir. Out of the unsatisfactoriness of separation arises the intuition that there is something more real than you are now conscious of. It is the intuition that there is truth, although you do not know what it is. But you know, you intuit, that truth exists, truth that has absolutely nothing to do with your ideas about it. But somehow you know that the truth about you and all of life exists.”
Therefore, from this "unsactisfactoriness of separation," seek out the ground of truth through relationship (why choose any other 'individual' path?). From a depth of engagement with the illusion, together we overcome it in realizing we united to make it “real.” Now we simply unite to make it true.

It’s not the space between thoughts that need be discovered, but the space between minds that need be converged because, from that space, ”individuals” emerged and, in that alone, illusion was made “real” and egoic compromises, or distinctions, were manufactured to define illusion as “real.” Unfortunately, we have yet to realize the true, simply because we seek to find it as 'individuals.'

“Once you receive this intuition, this revelation, you will be compelled to find it. You will have no choice in the matter. You will have consciously begun the authentic quest for enlightenment, and there is no turning back. Life as you’ve known it will never be quite the same.”
Although the revelation (or revealing) is through another, the ego will insist that you engage the "authentic quest for enlightenment” alone. This is because individual ego-self relies distinctly on distrust and, thus, alienation, from others in order to advance itself through delusional inequality.

This is why so many fail to realize truth undiluted by egoic constructions simply because they seek to attain it as an individual, while other minds remain in absentia of that truth. Unfortunately, “master teachers,” such as Adyashanti, perpetuate that same delusion and, therefore, become victims themselves, as the past is repeated, ad nauseam, from individual to individual.

“Seeking truth can be a game, complete with a new identity as a truth-seeker fueled by new ideas and beliefs. But ceasing to cherish illusions is no game; it’s a gritty and intimate form of deconstructing yourself down to nothing. Get rid of all of your illusions and what’s left is the truth. You don’t find truth as much as you stumble upon it when you have cast away your illusions.”
The one illusion you must cease to cherish is that you, alone are "truth-seeker" and can access truth, because that “game” is finite. Discard only this illusion and “what’s left is the truth.” We will certainly “stumble on it” together, but only in realizing it cannot be discovered alone. Until we all join in the infinite game, individuals will continue to access finite outcomes and call these individual rewards "enlightenment," "awakening," "revelation," etc, etc, etc.

“Truth can’t be found by seeking it, simply because truth is what you are. Seeking what you are is as silly as your shoes looking for their soles by walking in circles. What is the path that will lead your shoes to their soles? That’s why the Zen master said, “Do not seek the truth.” Instead, cease cherishing illusions.”
Which is exactly what we do, as the ‘ego-self’ travels in circles by following itself. All the self need do is realize that even its illusions are not manufactured in solitude. This halts the ego-self in its tracks, as it must now join with another to finally understand itself. It is this collaborative understanding that ceases to cherish illusions and discovers truth together as one.

“To cease cherishing illusions is a way of inverting the energy of seeking. The energy of seeking will be there in one form or another until you wake up from the dream state. You can’t just get rid of it. You need to learn how to invert it and use the energy to deconstruct the illusions that hold your consciousness in the dream state.”
Exactly. But that “energy” remains contained and limited because “you” seek to deconstruct “you.” Go ahead and deconstruct "me," as "I" simultaneously deconstruct “you,” and from that ground of relating the Truth-of-Being (hyphenated to denote unity) will be discovered together, because no one individual could possibly realize the absolute and unconditional, in which making such a discovery is conditioned solely on an ego-self. The idea that one must first become "enlightened," or experience the non-dual, and only then teach others, is absurd and makes suffering true for all but the 'enlightened masters' like Adyashanti.

“This sounds relatively simple, but the consequences can seem quite disorienting, even threatening. I’m not talking about a new spiritual technique here; I’m talking about a radically different orientation to the whole of your spiritual life. This is not a little thing. It is a very big thing, and your best chance of awakening depends on it. “Do not seek the truth; simply cease cherishing illusions.” And if you’re like most spiritually oriented people, your spirituality is your most cherished illusion. Imagine that.”
There is nothing threatening about solitary seeking and the ego relishes the chance to be the ‘one’ to spend years "discovering truth" and all the paradigms of the ‘dream-world’ piggy-back off this basic delusion. But truth discovered by an individual can only be relative to that individual and therefore, NOT truth at all.

The most "threatening" ego endeavor is to discover truth through, and with, another, because in that discovery love is experienced unconditioned by egoic constructs. Yet, in that discovery “you” cease to be experienced as “you” now know your ‘self’ and “we” takes on a new perspective never before encountered.

There is nothing radical to Adyashanti’s teachings, only the same conventional wisdom pointing to the way that “you” can find truth. Unfortunately, what “you” find is what Adyashanti has found, only more illusion. Sadly, this distorted view continues to be the path of the neo-Zen, non-dualers and this individual “hero’s journey” will only continue to demand seeking truth by inadvertently excluding it.

However, the truth available in the depth of relationship was always the archetypal Christ/Buddha message until ego-self got a hold of it and made that message it’s own. Now we have lost the message, but have gained many messengers still cherishing illusions.

(Artwork: "Delusion Dwellers" by Laurie Lipton)

8 comments:

  1. "In illusion what is true?
    Illusion is from the outset true.
    In illusion what is manifested?
    The very illusion itself is manifestation.
    If this is so,
    then one can never be apart from illusion?
    No matter how you seek illusion,
    you won't find it."
    - Ts'ao Shan (840-901)

    What is the hope in this Truth? That life may or may not be meaningless only because Death exists to challenge all of our notions?

    I was thinking about those who recently died in Sedona and who had paid $9,000. only to discover their own deaths awaited them in a make-shift sweat lodge. Now there are lawsuits pending to hold someone monetarily accountable for the illusion the now dead believed was another step in the road to this Truth, and to serve the living as balm for suffering the loss.

    Perhaps Truth, itself, is the illusion? Carry water from the well, either way, as is said. I get the impression that the quest for Truth is the quest to break free from carrying the water from the well. And for a fee and for an hour or two, one gets to believe that's True.

    "Whenever two or more are gathered..." does it then separate the truth from illusion? There's always mob mentality to consider. So, if you stand apart you either gain followers and start a new religion or you get burned at the stake. Somewhere between truth and illusion, there is a middle? In the middle, one is just as equally in danger of being duped or disengaged. It seems a double/tripled edged sword no matter which way you look at it.

    Maybe the Truth is how good one is at making money off illusions. Maybe that is the lesson no one ever sees. Beg, borrow, earn, slave, steal or impart wisdom, it is all about money.

    Good post.

    Blessings~

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thought you'd enjoy Steve Salerno's latest. Sunday, 18 October. I just read it.

    http://shambook.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nahnni,

    I suppose it's probably best to not "stand apart." Maybe that way you neither gain followers nor become one. I wonder if that's possible, to never stand apart? To NOT be a follower or a leader?

    Read Salerno's blog. Sad how pitiful we are when we attempt to stand apart.

    Thanks,
    mikeS

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it is a fine line, or even a precarious one, between standing apart and not standing apart. I think it depends on circumstance and motivation. Some struggle to follow or to even stand apart and there is a consequence either way, both socially and individually.

    The pitiful thing about the Sedona fiasco, to my mind, is that those involved wanted someone else to tell them some deep pathway, as though the "leader" had some great insight into the "Truth" unto himself and which only he could impart. We look back and are appalled at the Jim Jones insanity and yet, on a smaller scale where tragedies occur like the one in Sedona, it is the same story only played out differently. The followers followed and the leader led and no one considered the abdication of reason in the process. And as you say and Salerno alludes as well: "[the]delusional mindset is contagious, since the message is passed from one idolized messenger to another."

    Again, I wonder what, indeed, separates us and what brings us together in a common and wholesome bond or dooms us in following the pied piper? Reason? Insight? How far does the collective go until every individual arrives at the reasonable conclusion? The Salem Witch Trials are a perfect example of insanity that ended by the realization it all was, indeed, insane.

    Thanks, Mike, for bringing thoughts to the table as you do.

    Blessings~

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Nahnni!

    "Again, I wonder what, indeed, separates us and what brings us together in a common and wholesome bond or dooms us in following the pied piper? Reason? Insight? How far does the collective go until every individual arrives at the reasonable conclusion?"

    hmmm...not sure. Maybe when we realize the pied piper has nothing we need?

    Thanks!
    mikeS

    ReplyDelete
  6. He IS married, so he is "seeking" as an individual who's in a relationship. His wife "seeks" as well. One can't control another person's ideas/concepts about "truth", regardless.

    Do you resent this man? Are you jealous? I'm not sure. I'm going to see him speak for 2 hours in Philadelphia next month. We will be in a room full of others, together, minds sharing. Is there some reason I should not go?

    ReplyDelete
  7. By all means...enjoy it!

    I've seen his talks and they're quite fascinating.

    Yet, I would use everything said to go deeper down the rabbit hole.

    Accept nothing, question everything...
    mike S

    ReplyDelete
  8. So basically, you're afraid to be alone?

    ReplyDelete