Here is a typical non-dual quote: “Awakening is the experience of Pure Being.”
Abstractions such as this compel the non-dualer wannabes to consider "Pure Being" as individually attainable and then work to attain it.
“Hey, J oey, look at me! I’m Pure Being, bro!”
The problem is that "Pure Being" is another egoic delusion and, therefore, you will never access it, because it’ll never be “pure.”
So maybe you should accept the toxicity of Being?
If it’s relating to the world that you find ‘toxic,’ and thus seek to ‘purify,’ than count Being out of that equation (oh, it’s still there, you just don't realize it because you consider it 'impure').
Of course, you can conjure up all manner of meditative neurochemical imbalances, get some great whiz-bangs, and call that an experience of “Pure Being.” But then, you can also have an exhilarating bowel movement and call that an experience of Pure Being. What's the difference? (had one just this morning!).
Being is experienced in relationship and it is never “pure,” or free of engagement, although the depth of that engagement may be self-limiting. Pick and choose a "path" to Being and, make no mistake, your engagement with Being may Be significantly curtailed.
Being don’t need no stinkin “spiritual path” to Be.
You certainly experience a separate ‘self,’ but that self is always in relationship to other separate selves. Being knows it is Being through engagement with an experience of a ‘world.’
Hey, maybe that’s why the experience was conjured up in the first place! Ya think?
Your Being is never NOT in relationship. Being does NOT exist free of engagement and the fact that you believe it does, results in your failure to experience it (because you’re off on some mountain top seeking “Pure Being”). Being is always engaged and Being NOT in relationship, is just NOT Being and that’s impossible! (so furgetboutit).
However, you may find that the deeper you engage the ‘world’ you are Being with, the more intense that relationship is experienced and the more Being is accentuated and 'known.' (so come down from your mental mountain top and engage with your experience of a 'world').
The “I AM” is another mirage of an ego-self relating to its own self-construction at the expense of Being.
There is no “I” separate from Being engaged with “them.” You will know your Being through Being with others, all Being in a ‘world.’ However, you’re gonna need to BE with all of it. Exclude parts and ego has taken over and you’ll just complain about it not Being the way you want.
BEING WITH OTHERS IN A 'WORLD'
However, one day your ‘self’ will choose another ‘self’ to deeply engage with and we all feel that pull eventually (although we erroneously attribute it to bodily drives and instincts). This can actually be a quick and easy way of experiencing Being. Unfortunately, the very nature of your ego-self (“I”) will impede and limit the depth of that engagement and you will come close to the opportunity to experience Being (as 'one,' with and through another), only to extinguish it with "your" conditions.
You may never forget the intensity of that experience, and how it caused you to fully and deeply engage WITH your ‘world,’ but you may fail to realize that it was “you” who chose to end it. Nevertheless, when this is finally realized, you can always choose again and this time make the right choice. Eventually the right choice will be made and that's certain, so don't sweat it.
That last line - magic.
ReplyDeleteEven egoic illusion is God, don't forget!
Your writing gets better all the time. Kudos, and my conditioned mind/body thingy is a little jealous! (Just a little.)
Love, Suzanne
Well, I will be honest in that all this "being" "now" "presence" "awakening" "enlightenment", all of it, is beginning to sound like gibberish to me. Some bless'ed soul left a comment on my site and I couldn't understand it, though I tried, I really, really tried. Every other word alluded to "being" "presence" "beauty of being, presence" et al. It's like some alien abstract of language and a corruption of meaning.
ReplyDeleteIt's like the front page and the question of the day and answers like, "I am pure being with butterflies surrounding the essence of presence I feel in experiencing the vast oneness of this rainbow universe that manifests for me the now of my beingness." It's like really, really bad poetry that becomes nothing more and nothing less than nonsensical.
And so, I began to read with enthusiasm this essay you have offered here, and once my brain saw "Pure Being" it went into that spasmodic space where the jig saw puzzle fell into a thousand pieces on the floor.
And so I feared some post traumatic Gaia syndrome.
"don't sweat it."
And that's no bullshit.
I like what you say here, though, Mike. If one hides beneath the shell too long, it just washes up empty on the shore. You place it against your ear, and all you hear is the echo of the sea. How can one even begin to expand without any interaction? Maybe if one is an amoeba, I suppose.
Blessings of the Day~
Suzanne,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the reminder and the kind words!
Then I too, must admit my "jealousy", since over at your house you seem to generate more engaged discussion. I haven't yet got the hang of that and I think that really makes the blogging worthwhile.
Oh well...
Love,
mikeS
Mynahnni,
ReplyDelete"If one hides beneath the shell too long, it just washes up empty on the shore. You place it against your ear, and all you hear is the echo of the sea. How can one even begin to expand without any interaction? Maybe if one is an amoeba, I suppose."
You certainly have a wonderful way with words!
"Every other word alluded to "being" "presence" "beauty of being, presence" et al. It's like some alien abstract of language and a corruption of meaning."
Ha!! Nahnni, you've just given me a great idea for a fun future post! ha!
Thanks!
mikeS
Hey Mike, I've no idea why people comment, except that I've been linked to by Jeff Foster and suchlike. Assuredly it is NOT the superiority of my content!
ReplyDeleteNo One,
ReplyDeleteJeff Foster? Who he?
Actually, your content is exceptional and I'm sure you've recognized my piggy backing off your ideas. Of course, sometimes I go in the opposite direction, but that's all a part of the Drive-to-Question. I suppose like you, I enjoy being challenged.
Thanks!
mikeS
Jeff Foster is one of the nonduality dudes of the mo. His link, and others who mostly link back to me, is on my blog.
ReplyDeleteAnd, in that spirit, the blog entry I'm doing today is definitely bouncing off some of your "awakening with others" concepts. Just to be clear - I'm not sure I intellectually understand just what you're getting at, however, at the core I'm sure I know just what you mean. Words get in the way as much as they enlighten!
Love, Suzanne
Thanks for the link to my artwork. 8)
ReplyDeleteI quite like your article.
Leo,
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure!
Love your work.
Thanks,
mikeS