Monday, December 7, 2009

Bridging the Chasm of Egocentric Alienation


The ego-self fears honesty and this is the chief cause of all your failed relationships. They have failed because of your dishonesty.

However, egoic dishonesty is not necessarily predicated on the ego committing a lie, but simply on the ego omitting itself. As long as thoughts are concealed the ego-self gains a delusion of safety.

Unfortunately, this makes you estranged from those you "love" and, ultimately, the world. Even though basic interaction levels are high, disclosure remains surface and superficial.

The ego, or the identity that you insist is “you,” is ultimately defined by egocentric self-preservation. This egoic survival instinct is not simply concerned with bodily survival, since encounters with physical threats are rare. More often, the egos chief focus is psychological survival, which demands ever greater experiences of self-actualization, as opposed to self-diminishment.

The ego requires actualization of itself against its experience of a world and this actualizing is always in competition with other egos (in fact, ego actualization is little more than simply ‘rising above’ other actualizing egos). The greater actualized an ego is, based on the worlds standards of "success," the greater the egocentric experience of “existing.”

These are the finite games we play every day in the hope of ever greater self-actualization through specific outcomes.

The more actualized the ego-self, the more you feel "alive" (learned behavior based on the world’s standards). “Loving” relationships help egos feel alive and aid in egocentric actualizing. Although the ego has no idea what “love” is (always defined in relative terms) it does have an obscure recognition that “love” is a powerful means of self-actualizing itself. Yet, it must use caution, since it fears this could ultimately destroy it....and it's rightl.

Because the ego does not know what love is (merely senses the presence of something more powerful than itself), egoic love is always based on egocentric standards and conditions, causing conditional egic love to essentially fail to actualize the ego-self. Therefore, egoic “love” is no different then any other means of self-actualization, in that it is predicated on egocentric self-preservation and defines “love” in egocentric terms and conditions.

Initially, when you first met your “beloved” full disclosure was high on the ‘to-do list' and because of the immediate sense of self-actualization experienced by both, you both engaged in a high degree of honesty and self-exposure. You revealed all the thoughts in your head (well, almost all, but no ego ever feels that safe). Your past, your dreams and aspirations, and even your weaknesses, were fully exhibited to the loved one. This degree of honesty creates trust and trust leads to further honesty and disclosure.

Nevertheless, full honesty and complete disclosure is threatening to an ego preoccupied with self-actualization. All it took was one episode of perceived attack from the ‘beloved’ for the ego to begin limiting self-disclosure, thereby, impeding honesty. As a result, thoughts are made private and, gradually, communication becomes superficial and surface oriented.

Because the ego is a survival machine, your beloved easily detected your withholding, no matter how veiled and camouflaged. This precipitated his/her withdrawal in response and gradually over time, (because moments of honesty can result in severe conflict) the ego increasingly begins to perceive honesty as threatening to self-preservation.

Because of this alienation (from lack of honesty) omission becomes the norm and alienation dissolves intimacy and results in increasing estrangement. From this, you are merely a hop, skip and jump away from dissolving all egoic remnants of “love” and the beloved gradually manifests as antagonistic, no longer deserving of honesty or trust. Now, you merely seek to avoid conflict and this requires thoughts remain increasingly more private and so the ego seeks to fortify the mind from honesty.

This is how your most intimate relationships, which once provided the promise of awakening to a love without condition, became a conditional hell on earth. The ego shuts itself off from intimacy for the sake of self-preservation and fear is preserved and estrangement is always the result of fear. The ego demands that thoughts be protected and concealed and, as a result, understanding dissolves into estrangement.

There is only one way to bridge the chasm of alienation and that is through honesty. But it is not the shallow or superficial honesty that renews and reconciles relationships, but the honesty that is absent all fear and allows complete vulnerability in its depth. But first, You must discover why you are protecting and from who...

Withhold the contents of your mind and you obstruct the Deep Understanding that two or more can realize and 'awaken' to. Seek to conceal your mind and you alienate yourself from those you’ve chosen to love and both you and they will suffer.

Against the ego’s protests you must free yourself from this self-imposed alienation and awaken to the one unifying field of the un-conditioned. Deep Spirit communication requires that two minds be prepared to give and accept total honesty. Close off the mind by picking and choosing what can and cannot be communicated and estrangement becomes the norm and you will continue to wonder why all your relationships always seem to fail.

Without total honesty, you have yet to experience your only purpose....


Artwork by Scott G Brooks - "Till Death Do Us Part"

8 comments:

  1. The phenomenon you describe carries with it the inability, or at least extreme reluctance, of some egos to bear uncomfortable feelings. They're bearable! But not too many egos believe it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a great post. The dilemma, of course, is that at a very, very early age, we are given the double-edged sword of honesty v. keeping thoughts to oneself, lest someone be offended, hurt, uncomfortable, exposed, prideful, and so forth and so on. There is always risk and we are warned externally, therefore internally, from the onset from the consequences of truth or dare...of the risk we face in being trusting, being honest.

    I think people are beaten down by almost brutal dishonesty, by agenda, by betrayal of trust. We become martyrs to dishonesty for fear of confrontation, from ourselves, from others. Trust and honesty are equal measures. I think we hide our vulnerability because we fear the scales might tip if we are not attentive. In fear of loneliness, we sacrifice the balance in order to remain visible, if even superficially.

    To be authentic within a relationship, with equal honesty and trust, I think people want that, at least in theory, but they fear it more than realizing it to be possible. So, they wear many masks, even from the beginning.

    I realize I am terribly cynical.

    Blessings~

    ReplyDelete
  3. No One,

    "The phenomenon you describe carries with it the inability, or at least extreme reluctance, of some egos to bear uncomfortable feelings. They're bearable! But not too many egos believe it."

    Indeed, they are "bearable." But, we not only hide the feelings from others, but the ego seeks to hide them from the itself, since the ego-self is a compartmentalizing wizard.

    Nevertheless, the ego seems to believe that if it suffers in private, it will not alienate others. Unfortunately, this seems to have the reverse effect.

    Maybe if we deeply engage together in our 'solitary sufferings' we will dissolve them, particularly if alienation is really all that we suffer from. Why fear suffering? Why not share it?

    Unfortunately, suffering is not in style, so we avoid sharing it...

    Thanks!
    mikeS

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nahnni,

    "The dilemma, of course, is that at a very, very early age, we are given the double-edged sword of honesty v. keeping thoughts to oneself, lest someone be offended, hurt, uncomfortable, exposed, prideful, and so forth and so on."

    Exactly! We have been conditioned to lock the self away, to the point that, in not sharing for fear of consequences, we come to even doubt the interior experience we call "I."

    "I think people are beaten down by almost brutal dishonesty, by agenda, by betrayal of trust. We become martyrs to dishonesty for fear of confrontation, from ourselves, from others."

    Yes and the world we experience becomes nothing but seemingly endless hypocrisy.

    "Trust and honesty are equal measures. I think we hide our vulnerability because we fear the scales might tip if we are not attentive. In fear of loneliness, we sacrifice the balance in order to remain visible, if even superficially."

    Yes! Our superficiality is very visible and has become the norm.

    "To be authentic within a relationship, with equal honesty and trust, I think people want that, at least in theory, but they fear it more than realizing it to be possible. So, they wear many masks, even from the beginning."

    Yes and maybe "awakening" is nothing more than finally meeting someone who you never need wear a "mask" for.

    "I realize I am terribly cynical."

    Ha! join the club. However, cynicism is a game like any other, so no need to take it seriously.

    Thanks!
    mikeS

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Mike,

    The temptation to make light of the idea "sharing our suffering" was great. I'm always up for a good laugh. However, I'm going to take a different road today.

    It is only now in my life, what I often see as very, very late, I am sharing my suffering and experiencing the opposite benefit you mentioned in an earlier comment. Needed to acknowledge its importance, maybe life saving importance.

    TY for another affecting and effective article.

    Barbara

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Barbara,

    I too am coming late to the idea that I need to be more aware of the directions I was taught...

    ...and go the opposite way...

    Thanks!
    mikeS

    ReplyDelete
  7. I feel like this applies to my life quite well. Although i'm always thinking it'll be too hard/scary (to be completely honest) and spend time trying to make it more bearable to begin to do. I imagine it as a one time conversation and wonder how i would even bring things up, but then i think i'd probably have to be an ongoing thing over time. is there anyway to make going about this any easier? or do you have to just go for it, even if you feel like you might be crippled by your fear and doubt and fall into utter despair + loneliness.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "is there anyway to make going about this any easier? or do you have to just go for it, even if you feel like you might be crippled by your fear and doubt and fall into utter despair + loneliness."

    yes, I'm afraid that's pretty much it. Egos learn through experience.
    Psychology calls it "desensitization training," but that usually relates to overcoming phobias.
    But soon you begin to wonder what you were afraid of for so long and what you were trying to protect from. You become desensitized to fear and start to more fully engage others and your world. Yet, once you begin making little leaps, the momentum of it just sucks you in.

    Thanks,
    mikeS

    ReplyDelete