Thursday, February 26, 2009

Give Up Your Plans to "Awaken" (and "awaken")


To plan your “awakening” is to create defenses against "awakening."

The idea that YOU know the way is absurd, simply because your best thinking got you here and that’s because your best thinking is most likely somebody else’s.

Recycled thinking means that your plans of “awakening” are recycled plans and this is exactly what the world suffers from and it’s called “repetition compulsion.” The ego-self has a need to repeat the past simply because without a past to refer to, it (“you”) could not exist.

When you adopt another's plan you adopt their fear and your defensiveness proves this true. The world is nothing but centuries of recycled fear. Just look around you and notice how, with all the incessant planning and preparation, nothing ever really changes. Maybe we should just give up all our grand plans and see what happens. Just be prepared for a SURPRISE!

By Giving up your plans, you give up your defenses.

If there is nothing to defend against, then there is nothing to fear. This is because, once you plan, you will then seek to defend your plans from doubt. Yet, ironically, to defend your plan is to doubt that your plan is the way, otherwise, why defend it. If it was the way, it would need no defense from doubt.

Fear causes us to defend against doubt, because your plan is to “know” and doubt is not part of that plan. This is why doubt is considered negative, and defended against, while the planning goes on, ad nauseum.

I merely suggest the inverse, that doubt is the fuel that will take you "there," but only when you give up your notions of what "there" is.

However, the ego demands anchoring to a plan and that plan must come from the world, since where else would you get your schemes of "awakening." As if there is a plan to finding God and that plan is available in the world. Ha!

Adopt a spiritual ideology and you have adopted a plan and most likely it's someone else’s plan.

Obviously, we adopt the plans of others primarily because we fear we are much too weak and inadequate to devise our own plan. Of course, that’s part of the plan, because if you considered yourself powerful enough to know God, you would find your own way "there." To be fearless is to surrender their plans and make your own, but, of course that would assert your power by denying your weakness.

The plan you adopt from another was never theirs to begin with.

They adopted it from someone previously, who adopted it from another, who adopted it from another, on and on, through 'time.' So who constructed the first plan? Buddha, Jesus? Nope. Because history tends to show that most of those plans, or paradigms, existed, in some form or another, before the devout ones gave lip-service to them and this lends credence to the suggestion that Jesus and Buddha never really existed.

It’s just that we needed someone to give us the map, since the map could not have just materialized in our thinking, from absolutely nowhere. Yet, maybe it did. Nevertheless, the ego-self demands another ego-self, wiser and more superior, to provide direction.

There are many plans available to help you negotiate a difficult world and many are good plans. So feel free to use those plans. However, if you plan to transcend the world, or the ego-self which constructed it, then recognize that every plan found IN the world only reinforces your bondage to the world.

I would suggest that if you make your own plans, that you simply allow in your plans this clause: “all plans subject to change without prior notice.”

That way you won’t have to defend against your doubt and you can live joyously through it. Because, make no mistake, you will never be free of doubt. But that’s okay, since doubt has always been part of the plan. To be completely free of doubt means there’s nothing more to learn and all is known. But that would deny that we're all playing an infinite game.

I always find it interesting how the ego compromises with the infinite (or eternal) by determining a fixed point in time for which it can be known. I’m sure that those who are “awakened” clearly recognize this contradiction. However, the "unawakened" will probably continue to plan in preparation for what someone else predicted as “true.”

“Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends!”
- ELP

5 comments:

  1. Nice post.

    The first obstacle to awakening is being caught in the mind and not realizing it. It seems more and more people are realizing this now. Once we realize this, we immediately run into the second obstacle, which can show up as many things. I generalize to call it the "spiritualized" ego. The ego loves to gets its teeth into spirituality and awakening, get attached to traditions and methods, and look to external authorities, and make plans for an awakening event in the future, and make all sorts of imagery about what awakening is. It's a tough obstacle, and possibly that's why there are a plethora of misleading teachers and coaches, and as you've pointed out elsewhere, awakening is strangely a commercial industry.
    An early decision to rely only on direct experience has served me well. The Buddha said don't believe anything until it agrees with your experience, and Seng-t'san says "don't seek truth, only cease to cherish opinion" but of course once you have decided to rely only on your authority (not the ego's and not external), you don't even need those honored confirmations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Kaushik!

    Thanks for you comment. You bring up some good points regarding ego dynamics and that's pretty much what this blog focuses on.

    I've got some questions about "direct experience" and I'll be posting them later.

    From my 'experience' there are egoic frames of reference, or interpretations, so I often wonder if ego is ever completely absent from any experience, since it seems there must be an 'I' conceptualization in order to have an experience at all.

    An 'I' experiencing is essentially a concept having an experience that in some sense must be conceptual.

    Anyway, I look forward to your comments once I get the post up.

    Thanks!
    mikeS

    ReplyDelete
  3. There can be experience without the experiencer so I don't know that concepts are needed...what I just wrote too of course is a concept for it is not direct experience yet; my "I" is very much alive. Paradoxes abound around awakening.

    I don't know if the ego ever completely vanishes; I tend to think it is seen through rather than annihilated, but again, I don't know from direct experience, though deep in meditation that's what it feels like.

    In my experience, reliance on direct experience is not a rejection, it's more of a "don't deny, don't follow" sort of thing. Signposts are fine; I just try to avoid attachment and dogma. In the beginning it's uncomfortable, for all the mind can really know from direct experience are: I exist, there is awareness, and all experience is in the Now. And it turns out the first belief is false. The mind will think that's not enough to believe in; it turns that's all we need to get started. Interesting stuff...

    ReplyDelete
  4. hi mike
    yes - thoughts are very rarely (if ever) original... ideas about awakening - adopting that idea or any idea is an investment the ego makes... i just wrote about that today actually in my new little blog... called arpita's - if you care to read it... i called the post "spiritual real estate" - and i am quite sure there isn't one original thought in my entire post. haha...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kaushik,

    Yes, the paradoxical nature is very thick in all this. I don't feel the ego ever fully vanishes or is transcended, just continual transformation, I suppose.

    Arpita,

    "spiritual real estate," I like that! You are developing a great blog and I like your stream of consciousness writing, very easy to follow.

    Thanks Guys!
    mikeS

    ReplyDelete